The Big Squeeze, aka the California Water Model
If you came to this page to sign a petition to Governor Greg Abbott, today we ask you to write a letter to the Governor instead. After you review this page, put together your message about your water concerns, then go here to the Governor's webpage. If you prefer, you can call his hotline. We are happy to assist you if you want some help. Just give us a call at 512.213.4511 or email us at email@example.com. Thank you for caring about our most precious resource currently at the mercy of land speculators, water hustlers and failure from leaders of both parties, and all factions therein. LIV
Water is the most valuable resource on the planet. But the Texas Legislature is far too busy with culture wars, in-fighting, strangling the opposing party, political deals and throwing us red meat to pay attention to bread and butter. That's our water and energy.
Millions of Texans got a terrible taste of what it's like to live without power and water in the middle of a Big Freeze in February 2021.
To make our point, we have said repeatedly that the "California Water Model" -- moving masses of water for real estate development -- is a proven disaster. Conservation, after the fact, won't cut it.
In November 2021, Texas State University's Meadows Center for Water and Environment, released its study, "Five Gallons in a Ten Gallon Hat: Groundwater Sustainability in Texas." The Executive Summary on page 7 makes plain the time to act is now.
If you really want to understand what happened to California, watch the fantastic 4-part 1997 documentary, "Cadillac Desert," or pick up the book. As author Marc Reisner says in the documentary, "The idea of subduing nature captivated the whole country."
Texas Water Policy is based on the false notion that we can "subdue" nature. No, we can kill nature and then everyone loses.
Independent Politics and Public-Private Partnerships
Short-sighted water policy has been in place in Texas for a long time. Texans have watched the draining of the Ogallala Aquifer in West Texas for decades. But, the idea of subduing nature – our water supply – recently went into overdrive in Texas in 2014 with the largest public-private partnership water pipeline in the nation – Vista Ridge. The project was forced on rural, suburban and urban Texans against all of our interests.
When the massive Vista Ridge $3+ billion, 142-mile Vista Ridge pipeline was rushed through the San Antonio City Council by their water utility – San Antonio Water System (SAWS) -- we asked just whose game was it? LIV quickly named the project "The San Antone Hose," stealing the phrase used years earlier for another project by former State Senator Troy Fraser.
Political independents likened The Hose to Rick Perry's failed Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC), which would have required the largest land grab in Texas history for the public-private partnership aka The NAFTA Highway. A cross-partisan movement encouraged Carole Strayhorn in her 2006 independent gubernatorial campaign bid to make the TTC a top issue. She did, but the independent vote was split with Kinky Friedman. Rick Perry was reelected with only 39%. Nevertheless, the TTC bit the dust in the 2007 legislative session.
The problems with public-private partnership abuse have remained in Texas. The "P3" iVista Ridge project has kept citizen watchdogs from obtaining records that remain
private behind the private partners of Vista Ridge.
Watch our 17-minute video on this page (see the mama and baby horses), "We Oppose the San Antone Hose," released in 2015 and parked on this page. As you watch, just think about how mass movement of groundwater is being used to subsidize hyper-growth throughout Texas. These policies are killing Texas.
Watch LIV's 17-minute video about Vista Ridge, "I Oppose the San Antone Hose."
Water as a Subsidy for In-Migration Growth
The idea of subduing nature – our water supply – only recently went into overdrive in Texas
in 2013. That's when Governor Rick Perry ramped up his "Come to Texas" program,
especially water guzzling high-tech businesses from California. Our larger municipalities
(with City Councils dominated by Democrats) bought into the notion that all growth -- especially
rapid growth -- is great. But, who pays for the infrastructure? Current residents, rural landowners
and our aquifers -- Mother Nature's natural water storage beneath our feet.
San Antonio Gives SAWS Green Light to Vista Ridge Bums' Rush
The $3 billion 142-mile Vista Ridge mega-water pipeline was opposed by many non-profit groups
and churches in San Antonio. Their fear was that San Antonio, one of the poorest cities in the
nation, would face harsh water rate hikes for a project doomed to reverse San Antonio's stellar
efforts to conserve water. Besides, everyone knew the water was destined for buildout of a metroplex
between San Antonio and Austin.
Most San Antonio Chambers of Commerce were for Vista Ridge. Landowners, having learned the
extent they were hornswoggled by door-to-door salesmen arm-twisting them and cursing them with
supposedly lucrative water told this repeated story. That when they continued to refuse to lease or
sell their water, marketers told them they would get it anyway because their neighbors had signed.
SAWS gave the 500+page contract for Vista Ridge the bums rush. In a mere 30 days of pretense
review it was a done deal. The unanimous approval from mostly all Democratic City Council sealed
the deal. A voter referendum to call the project into question with a public vote was impossible due
to San Antonio's onerous petition for reversal of Council action -- approximately 70,000 signatures
in 40 days.
One of the few Republicans on San Antonio City Council at the time was Joe Krier. Krier, the
longtime former President of the San Antonio Chamber of Commerce. Krier was Vista Ridge's prime
mover. Ironically, he lived in a wealthy subdivision with its own water utility, Cadillac Water
In April 2020, the Vista Ridge Project started pumping full bore at 50,000 acre-feet per year.
Within six months, landowner well failures began in the source communities of Burleson, Milam,
and Lee counties. Mind you, Vista Ridge LLC has a 30-year contract.
There remain serious questions as to how much pumping the slow recharging aquifers used for Vista Ridge can withstand. Aquifers are geological formations generated over thousands of years and cannot be simply "fixed."
Click here for LIV's Vista Ridge FACTS, this is the long and winding story with documentation yet to be countered by the prime movers of Vista Ridge. If you have questions or challenges, please do contact LIV.
Lee County landowners, Del Faske (L) and Henry Urban, on the steps of San Antonio City Hall.
2015 rally at San Antonio City
Hall with landowners from Lee, Bastrop, Burleson & Milam
counties united with San Antonio residents and activists.
LIV worked for two years to help shape our first large-scale "Homegrown Petition" drive for the SAWS Accountability Act. It was, unfortunately, in the height of the first wave of COVID. Yet some terrific volunteers gathered 12,000 of the needed 20,000 signatures for a public vote to gain oversight of SAWS and a simple audit of Vista Ridge. SAWS even spent taxpayer dollars with a sneak legal attack in a failed attempt to stop petitioners.
The "SAWS ACT PAC" coalition brought together a cross-partisan group rarely seen together in this time of partisan division. We joined together -- and we would do so today -- from across the Vista Ridge pipeline from rural Burleson, Milam, Lee and Bastrop counties to San Antonio and points along the way..
We especially thank LIV Advisors and attorneys, Michele Gangnes and James Murphy, and auditor, Colleen Waring (a Milam County landowner affected by Vista Ridge) who provided the support to draft the SAWS Accountability Act. The petition drive, led by Reinette King, Dr. Terry Burns (Alamo Sierra Club), Ellen Berky (LIV), Stan Mitchell (SAMBA Coalition), George Alejos (LULAC Zapatista Concilio 4383), Joe Caddell, Bob Martin (Homeowner Taxpayer Association of Bexar County), and Southwest Workers Union worked their hearts out. We apologize here for leaving out any of those who tried to make this happen in the year of COVID.
Special thanks to Bill Bunch and Save Our Springs Alliance for their rapid and vigorous
defense of petitioners in a sneak holiday legal action (a "1205 petition" by SAWS to stop petitioners. It failed.
Michele Gangnes (L), and Rinette King, receiving water awards.
Water Defender? That's you!
Check out the non-profit "Water Defenders" -- the Simsboro Aquifer Water Defense Fund, and
TAKEAWAYS FOR ACTION
Work with your local non-profit water defender groups and ask them to join LIV to advocate for our water agenda in 2023. Check this webpage for the agenda coming soon, or contact us. The heart of the agenda will be this:
Cross-regional supply projects undermine the State Water Plan, which costs taxpayers approximately $17 million to produce every 5 years. Cross-regional supply projects, like Vista Ridge, should only be allowed when every other option has been examined. In other words, let's give the State Water Plan some teeth.
As for Vista Ridge? Learn the facts by watching the "We Oppose the San Antone Hose" LIV video posted on this page and review the Facts on SAWS and Vista Ridge.
Read LIV Advisor, James Murphy's, riveting 2018 testimony to the Sunset Advisory Committee urging they take action to:
"Get the LCRA out of the groundwater development business and to return to their core mission of managing the water supply and environmental flows along the Colorado River."
Become a member of LIV or donate today.